Which rule prohibits officers from confiscating properties that may be means of committing violence?

The rule that prohibits officers from confiscating properties that may be means of committing violence is rooted in the principles outlined in Republic Act 9165, otherwise known as the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 in the Philippines. This act is focused primarily on the control and regulation of dangerous drugs but also embodies broader legal protections regarding individual rights, which include preventing unlawful seizure of property.

The importance of this act lies in its emphasis on protecting citizens from arbitrary actions by law enforcement, particularly when it comes to property that could be misused in the commission of violent acts. It safeguards against the unlawful confiscation of items without due process or probable cause, ensuring that the rights of individuals are upheld even in the context of preventing crime.

In contrast, other choices do not specifically address the issue at hand. The Criminal Procedure Code outlines general procedures for law enforcement and the conduct of trials but does not specifically focus on the protections related to confiscation of properties in the context of potential violence. The Law on Preventive Imprisonment pertains to the preventive detention of individuals rather than the confiscation of property. Guidelines on Search and Seizure provide frameworks for how searches and seizures should be conducted, but under Republic Act 9165, there are more explicit and