What typically happens to evidence obtained through an illegal search?

Evidence obtained through an illegal search is usually deemed inadmissible in court due to the exclusionary rule. This legal principle aims to deter law enforcement from conducting illegal searches and violations of individuals' rights. When the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is violated, any evidence collected as a result can be challenged and excluded from trial.

Thus, courts generally do not allow such evidence to be presented because it conflicts with the rights to privacy and protection from unreasonable searches. The primary goal of this exclusion is to uphold the integrity of the judicial process and discourage unlawful behavior by law enforcement. In contrast, the other options suggest scenarios where such evidence could still be considered in court, which does not align with established legal standards surrounding illegal searches.